A QUICK REVIEW OFOFFENSE-DEFENSE THEORY

POLITICS OF CYBERSECURITY

PROF. BENJAMIN BARTLETT

MIAMI UNIVERSITY

DEFINITION: SECURITY DILEMMA

Image Source: Dr. Seuss,The Butter Battle.

TWO MAJOR ISSUES

  1. Does offense or defense have the advantage inconflict (offense-defense balance)?
  2. Can we tell the difference between offensiveand defensive postures (offense-defensedifferentiation)?

THE FOUR WORLDS (JERVIS 1978)

Offense Has the Advantage

Defense Has the Advantage

Offensive Posture notDistinguishable from DefensiveOne

Doubly Dangerous

(security dilemma + relativelyhigh probability of conflict)

Security dilemma, but relativelylow probability of conflict

Offensive Posture Distinguishablefrom Defensive One

No security dilemma, butsomewhat-heightened probabilityof conflict

Doubly Stable

(no security dilemma and lowprobability of conflict)

MEASURING THE OFFENSE-DEFENSE BALANCE

  1. Does it cost more to build offensive or defensivecapabilities?
  2. Given the same set of capabilities, is it better toattack or to defend?

WHAT AFFECTS THE OFFENSE DEFENSE BALANCE

  1. Technology: which is more costly---offensivetechnologies or defensive technologies? Whichmore effective?
  2. Geography: this can favor offense or defense

DETERMINING OFFENSE-DEFENSE DIFFERENTIATION

ADDITIONAL ADVANTAGES OF OFFENSE-DEFENSEDIFFERENTIATION

  1. Status quo states can identify each other.
  2. Advanced warning of aggression.
  3. Arms control agreements are easy.

CONCLUSION

Offense Has the Advantage

Defense Has the Advantage

Offensive Posture notDistinguishable from DefensiveOne

Doubly Dangerous

(security dilemma + relativelyhigh probability of conflict)

Security dilemma, but relativelylow probability of conflict

Offensive Posture Distinguishablefrom Defensive One

No security dilemma, butsomewhat-heightened probabilityof conflict

Doubly Stable

(no security dilemma and lowprobability of conflict)